What is the most significant factor that determines if an uninjured sexual assault victim is interviewed first or receives a sexual assault exam?

The time frame is the most significant factor in determining whether an uninjured sexual assault victim is interviewed first or receives a sexual assault exam. This is primarily due to the critical window in which evidence may be collected and preserved post-assault.

If several hours have elapsed since the incident, the likelihood of recovering physical evidence diminishes, which can affect the investigation and prosecution of the case. Prompt medical attention is essential not only for evidence collection but also for addressing any potential health concerns the victim may face, including sexually transmitted infections or pregnancy prevention. Therefore, the immediacy of the situation dictates whether a victim should be prioritized for an examination or if they should first undergo an interview to gather necessary information about the incident, ensuring that their rights and health are both protected in a timely manner.

While the other factors such as the victim's age, the nature of the assault, and the availability of medical staff are relevant in the broader context of victim care and response, they do not weigh as heavily in the immediate decision regarding the order of interview and medical examination as the time frame does.