Which case law is associated with custodial interrogation rights?

The case law associated with custodial interrogation rights is Miranda vs. Arizona. This landmark decision established the requirement that individuals taken into police custody must be informed of their rights prior to any interrogation. Specifically, the Supreme Court ruled that suspects must be made aware of their right to remain silent and their right to have an attorney present during questioning. This ruling was intended to protect Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination, ensuring that individuals are not coerced into providing incriminating evidence without understanding their legal protections.

In contrast, Roe vs. Wade addresses issues of privacy and reproductive rights, which is unrelated to custodial interrogation. Gideon vs. Wainwright deals with the right to legal counsel for defendants in criminal cases but does not focus specifically on the rights during the interrogation process. Lemon vs. Kurtzman pertains to the separation of church and state in education, which has no relevance to interrogative procedures in law enforcement.